CONSENSUS Project: Identifying Publicly Acceptable Policy Implementations

نویسنده

  • Konstantinos Tserpes
چکیده

Even though it is unrealistic to expect citizens to pinpoint the policy implementation that they prefer from the set of alternatives, it is still possible to infer such information through an exercise of ranking the importance of policy objectives according to their opinion. Assuming that the mapping between policy options and objective evaluations is a priori known (through models and simulations), this can be achieved either implicitly through appropriate analysis of social media content related to the policy objective in question or explicitly through the direct feedback provided in the frame of a game. This document focuses on the presentation of a policy model, which reduces the policy to a multi-objective optimization problem and mitigates the shortcoming of the lack of social objective functions (public opinion models) with a black-box, games-forcrowds approach.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Rendering an archive in three dimensions

We examine the requirements for a publicly accessible, online collection of three-dimensional biomedical image data, including those yielded by radiological processes such as MRI, ultrasound and others. Intended as a repository and distribution mechanism for such medical data, we created the National Online Volumetric Archive (NOVA) as a case study aimed at identifying the multiple issues invol...

متن کامل

Consensus and Single - Peakedness

Consider a set of K alternatives. We say that an alternative is socially acceptable if the number of individuals that rank it among their most preferred half of the alternatives is at least as large as the number of individuals that rank it among the least preferred half. A Condorcet winner is not necessarily socially acceptable. We propose a concept of consensus as a condition on preference pr...

متن کامل

An Introduction to Policy Delphi; A tool for discovering the opposing views on health policy issues

Objective: In this review, we investigated various aspects of Policy Delphi technique to make decision-makers more aware of this pertinent method so that they can use it in their policy decisions in their organizations. Information sources and selected methods for study: This study was conducted using a review method and by searching the related literature in databases such as PubMed, Scopus a...

متن کامل

Flotsam: Evaluating Implementations of the Raft Consensus Algorithm CS244B Project Report

The Raft consensus algorithm [1] is designed to be easily understood and implemented. Many opensource projects now implement Raft as a library or standalone service or incorporate it into more complicated distributed systems. However, the quality of these implementations has not been studied extensively. This work presents a system, Flotsam, for empirically testing Raft open-source implementati...

متن کامل

Implementation Issues in Secure E-voting Schemes

As cheating is an inherent threat to voting, it is essential that an e-voting system provides a high level of security. At the moment, commercially available e-voting solutions mainly advertise their convenience, efficiency and low cost. On the other hand, cryptographically secure voting schemes in the literature are generally considered to be complex and inefficient for a real-world implementa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1509.07698  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015